Read the case study titled “ING Life” found at the end of Chapter 7.
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Points: 80
Case Study 2: ING Life
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Assess the probable difficulties and risks associated with using a public infrastructure such as the Internet as part of a business solution.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletelyassessed the probable difficulties and risks associated with using a public infrastructure such as the Internet as part of a business solution.
Partiallyassessed the probable difficulties and risks associated with using a public infrastructure such as the Internet as part of a business solution.
Satisfactorilyassessed the probable difficulties and risks associated with using a public infrastructure such as the Internet as part of a business solution.
Thoroughlyassessed the probable difficulties and risks associated with using a public infrastructure such as the Internet as part of a business solution.
2. Analyze ING’s solution for providing security to determine if the solution is adequate or inadequate. Provide a rationale for your answer.
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or incompletelyanalyzed ING’s solution for providing security to determine if the solution is adequate or inadequate and did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your answer.
Partiallyanalyzed ING’s solution for providing security to determine if the solution is adequate or inadequate and partially provided a rationale for your answer.
Satisfactorilyanalyzed ING’s solution for providing security to determine if the solution is adequate or inadequate and satisfactorily provided a rationale for your answer.
Thoroughlyanalyzed ING’s solution for providing security to determine if the solution is adequate or inadequate and thoroughly provided a rationale for your answer.
3. Critique the extranet solution and recommend one (1) change to the solution to provide better connectivity to brokers.
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or incompletelycritiqued the extranet solution and did not submit or incompletely recommended one (1) change to the solution to provide better connectivity to brokers.
Partiallycritiqued the extranet solution and partially recommended one (1) change to the solution to provide better connectivity to brokers.
Satisfactorilycritiqued the extranet solution and satisfactorily recommended one (1) change to the solution to provide better connectivity to brokers.
Thoroughlycritiqued the extranet solution and thoroughly recommended one (1) change to the solution to provide better connectivity to brokers.
4. 2 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 6 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.