What are the differences or similarities in the techniques  recommended in your discussion compared to those identified by others?
September 7, 2018
What additional questions do you have after reading the posting? What clarification do you need regarding the posting? What differences or similarities do you see between your initial discussion thread and your classmates’ postings?
September 7, 2018

Analyze the recommendations made by others for each scenario. Do you  agree or disagree with the recommendations? Why or why not? Provide  examples where possible. 

TYPES OF TRAINEES DISCUSSION:

 

A successful trainer needs to effectively engage various types of  trainees and adapt quickly in the learning environment to meet their  needs. Chapter 8 of the Blanchard and Thacker (2013) text lists and  offers tips on dealing with different participant personalities. Review  the three scenarios below. Discuss how you would effectively engage and  manage each group of participants in a 2-day training seminar. Apply two  to three specific adult learning principles and/or techniques to each  of the scenarios listed below.

Scenario A
Your colleague is a training specialist who has just  concluded an activity on techniques for overcoming challenges in the  classroom. He clearly understood the content, but did not ask questions  of the group to confirm their understanding. In addition, when  explaining activities, the directions were not clear and there was never  an opportunity to ask for clarification. What constructive feedback  would you give to your colleague?

Scenario B
Your colleague is a department manager who has just  opened a training session. Her opening included group introductions, but  she went directly into presenting content. About an hour later, a few  participants began talking out of turn. What feedback would you give to  your colleague on the impact this may have had on participants, and what  could have been done differently to avoid this situation?

Scenario C
Your colleague is a human resources manager who just  completed an activity followed by a group discussion. The activity went  well, but the debrief did not. As the facilitator, he had trouble  getting the group to answer his questions. The group did not appear to  be very engaged. What feedback could you give him on how he could get  participants to participate?

Your initial post should be 250 to 300 words. Use this week’s lecture  as a foundation for your initial post. In addition to the Blanchard and  Thacker (2013) text, use at least one additional scholarly source to  support your discussion.

Respond to at least two other posts regarding items you found to be  compelling and enlightening. To help you with your reply, please  consider the following questions:

  • What did you learn from the posting?
  • What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
  • What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
  • What differences or similarities do you see between your initial discussion thread and your classmates’ postings?
  • What are the differences or similarities in the techniques  recommended in your discussion compared to those identified by others?
  • Analyze the recommendations made by others for each scenario. Do you  agree or disagree with the recommendations? Why or why not? Provide  examples where possible.

Your reply posts for Donald and Marcia should be a minimum of 150-250 words each. 

DONALDS DISCUSSION:

 

Scenario A-

The constructive criticism I would give my colleague would be to  speak up, if you cant hear the instructor then tell he or she to speak  louder. In addition, at the end of every lecture there should be a  answering questions portion, were everyone has a chance to reaffirm what  they thought or to get clarification on what is going on. When teaching  in a classroom the instructor always need to be clear and concise. At  the end of the lecture there should also be a sort of follow along test  or quiz for everyone to follow to brush up on what was being covered.

Scenario B-

The feedback I would give my colleague would be to start off with a  icebreaker before the training session actually begins and the content  isn’t understood. Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013) state  that,”An icebreaker is a game or exercise that prompts trainees to get  comfortable interacting with other trainees and the trainer. It is  designed to be fun but at the same time generate energy that will  transfer to the rest of the training”. When starting the training  session make sure there are ample amounts of bathroom breaks and letting  your audience know that it is ok to ask questions on anything they dont  understand.

Scenario C-

The feedback I would give my colleague would be that he or she didn’t  ask enough questions at the start of the session. Keeping the audience  in gaged on what you want them to learn is the key for them to keep  participating.4MAT 4Business(2010) state that,” everyone has a different  learning styles and everyone processes information differently”.  Including the audience while the activity is going on well help them  stay focused to give more points about what happened from the activity  to now.

Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013). Effective training:  Systems, strategies, and practices (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ:  Pearson Education, Inc.

4MAT 4Business. (2010, July 15). Three things every trainer should  know about learning styles[Video file]. Retrieved from  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhqtaYy-mIs

 

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now
Place Order

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp