This article review will help you to think critically about the relationship between budgeting and the security risks facing courthouses. Your review should address the following:

1. Summarize the article. (The summary should be between half of a page to one full page in length.) a. Summarize the main points of the author’s discussion.
b. Identify and elaborate on the main argument(s).
c. This summary will serve as the background for your analysis (see below).

2. Include an analysis of the article. (The analysis should be between one and a half pages to two pages in length.)

1. This is the most important section of your paper because it will consist of your analysis of the article. This section is to be original. It is your critique and review of the author’s discussion.
2. Think critically about the following when analyzing this article: Is the argument clear and organized?
   Is evidence presented, or is it mostly based on opinion?
   Is the argument logical?
   Does the article support your opinion of this topic?
   Who was the intended audience for this article?
   Did the article convince you? Why, or why not?
   Is the argument conventional or controversial? Is the argument interesting or boring? Do you have any suggestions for the author?
   Was the article useful for practitioners in this field?

Your article review should discuss the role that security office management plays in the proper planning and budgeting for potential security risks in courthouses. Also, describe why it is necessary to make sure that the court security budget allows for specific risk management programs to be enacted.

The review should be at least three pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. There must be at least one reference (i.e., the article being reviewed), but additional sources can (and should) be used to criticize or support the author’s arguments. The assignment, including all references, must be formatted according to APA standards.