PEST model
February 20, 2021Theory of justice as fairness
February 21, 2021The Value of Dialogue
Analyze how ground rules and dialogue can be used to grow a learning organization. Address the following elements:
-
- Describe the differences between debate, discussion, and dialogue.
- Analyze the value of dialogue in helping a team learn and change.
- What are the ground rules required to reach this level of conversation?
- Describe what you are learning about how to design an effective dialogue session.
- Analyze the ease or difficulty of conversing at this level. Comment on the dangers and obstacles.
Your assessment should be a minimum of 2 pages in length, double-spaced.
| Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyze the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. |
Does not describe the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. | Describes the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. | Analyzes the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change. | Analyzes the value of dialogue in helping teams learn and change, supporting analysis with theory or real-world examples. |
| Describe the ground rules required to reach conversational level in a dialogue. |
Does not describe the ground rules. | Describes the ground rules but does not connect ground rules to the requirements needed to reach conversational level in a dialogue. | Describes the ground rules required to reach conversational level in a dialogue. | Analyzes the ground rules required to reach conversational level in a dialogue, supporting the analysis with relevant theory and real-world examples. |
| Analyze learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. |
Does not describe learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. | Describes learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. | Analyzes learning related to designing an effective dialogue session. | Analyzes learning related to designing an effective dialogue session and provides recommendations for improving the design. |
| Analyze the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, including the dangers and obstacles. |
Does not describe the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, or the dangers and obstacles. | Describes the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, or the dangers and obstacles, but not both. | Analyzes the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, including the dangers and obstacles. | Analyzes the ease or difficulty of conversing in a team dialogue session, including the dangers and obstacles, providing real-world examples. |
| Define and compare debate, discussion, and dialogue. |
Does not define or compare debate, discussion, or dialogue. | Defines and compares debate, discussion, or dialogue, but not all three. | Defines and compares debate, discussion, and dialogue. | Defines and compares debate, discussion, and dialogue; and provides real-world examples of each. |