1. Assess how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in today’s environment.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletelyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in today’s environment.
Partiallyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in today’s environment.
Satisfactorilyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in today’s environment.
Thoroughlyassessed how the Carlson SAN approach would be implemented in today’s environment.
2. Compare the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletelycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.
Partiallycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.
Satisfactorilycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.
Thoroughlycompared the pros and cons of consolidating data on a SAN central data facility versus the dispersed arrangement it replaces.
3. Evaluate the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and determine the management options for dealing with this type of situation.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletelyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and did not submit or incompletely determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.
Partiallyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and partially determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.
Satisfactorilyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and satisfactorily determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.
Thoroughlyevaluated the issues raised from the Carlson SAN mixing equipment from a number of vendors and thoroughly determined the management options for dealing with this type of situation.
4. Justify the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlson’ s IP SAN.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletelyjustified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlson’ s IP SAN.
Partially justified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlson’s IP SAN.
Satisfactorily justified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlson’s IP SAN.
Thoroughlyjustified the reduction of administration and management of storage networking through Carlson’s IP SAN.
5. Assess how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN. Create a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletelyassessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and did not submit or incompletely created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.
Partially assessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and partially created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.
Satisfactorily assessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and satisfactorily created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.
Thoroughlyassessed how cloud computing could be used by Carlson instead of a SAN and thoroughly created a diagram using Visio or its open source alternative software to illustrate the use of cloud computing.
6. 3 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 6 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present
Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.